Who Can Sue Under the Antitrust Laws? Antitrust Injury Under Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat

The 1977 Supreme Court case Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat set an important precedent about who can or cannot be a plaintiff in an antitrust suit. Pueblo complained that Brunswick had caused an antitrust injury by saving bowling alleys that would otherwise have closed, thus producing less competition in the market. The Supreme Court found that, although Pueblo may have indeed suffered injury, the injury was not caused by harm covered by the antitrust laws.

Brianna Hills is an Associate at Boies Schiller Flexner LLP.

Brianna Hills

Associate

Boies Schiller Flexner LLP


Antitrust & Consumer Protection

The Federalist Society and Regulatory Transparency Project take no position on particular legal or public policy matters. All expressions of opinion are those of the speaker(s). To join the debate, please email us at rtp@regproject.org.

Get RTP content in your inbox!

Sign up now to stay up-to-date on all RTP content and events.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.