When Does Refusal to Deal Violate Antitrust Law?

In 2004, the Supreme Court decided Verizon Communications v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko. The case examined what types of monopolistic activities would violate antitrust laws. The Court addressed issues involving forced sharing, the risks and rewards of competition in a free market, and the role of governing regulations. The Trinko decision raises important questions and provides insightful consideration for examining antitrust issues.

Jan Rybnicek is Counsel at Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer.

* * * * *

As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker.

Jan Rybnicek

Counsel

Antitrust, Competition and Trade Group, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP


Get RTP content in your inbox!

Sign up now to stay up-to-date on all RTP content and events.